Thursday, February 22, 2024
HomeHealth & MedicineIntermittent Fasting 'No Magic Bullet for Weight Loss'

Intermittent Fasting ‘No Magic Bullet for Weight Loss’

A new study challenges intermittent fasting, also known as alternate day fasting or the ‘5:2’, as an effective way to lose weight.

When intermittent fasting was first introduced in the early 2000s, it was thought to be one of the most effective ways to lose weight. However, recent studies have shown that intermittent fasting may not be as effective as it was thought to be.

The main reason why this may be the case is that intermittent fasting is not a consistent way of eating. This means that people who intermittent fast will go through periods of eating and fasting, which can cause them to gain weight back.

Published on June 16 in the journal Science Translational Medicine, a new research from a team of physiologists at the University of Bath provides evidence indicating nothing special about ‘intermittent fasting’, challenging the effectiveness of the way to lose weight (Templeman et al., 2021).

What Is Intermittent Fasting?

Intermittent fasting is a way to help regulate our body’s metabolic rate. When we fast, our body cuts back on its calorie intake temporarily. This can help us lose weight and improve our health. There are different types of intermittent fasting, but the most common is the 16/8 method. This involves fasting for 16 hours and eating only during the eight hours after that.


In the last few years, intermittent fasting—skipping food for a few days in a week has become popular, supported by celebrities and photos of many people’s magnificent weight changes.

However, current evidence about ‘intermittent fasting’ effectiveness is limited compared with a more traditional way of dieting to reduce calorie intake.

In their randomized control trial, the researchers found that the participants in intermittent fasting lost less weight than the traditional way of dieting, even when the total calorie intake was at the same level.

More Read

The Study

The research team from the University’s Centre for Nutrition, Exercise & Metabolism (CNEM) designed the study protocol. They recruited 36 lean, healthy adults (Body mass index 20-25 kg/m2) during 2018-2020. The researchers assigned the participants randomly into three groups after four weeks of the baseline monitoring phase.

Intermittent fasting is no magic bullet, and the findings of our experiment suggest that there is nothing special about fasting when compared with more traditional, standard diets people might follow.
Professor James Betts

Group 1: alternate day fasting, the fasting day is followed by a day of eating, 50% more than usual (energy intake, 0:150%).

Group 2: Control, non-fasting, reduced calorie intake by 25%, every meal, every day, (energy intake, 75%:75%).

Group 3: alternate day fasting; the fasting day is followed by the day of eating 100% more than usual (energy intake, 0:200%).

At the beginning of the study period, participants across all three groups consumed a typical diet of around 2000-2500 kcal per day. After a three-week monitoring period, the two energy-restricted groups reduced their calorie intake between 1500-2000 kcal on average. 

Groups 1 and 2 had the same calorie intake but in different ways. Whereas group 3’s diet saw them fast without reducing overall calories.


The researchers found that participants in the non-fasting group (Group 2) lost 1.9 kg in three weeks. DEXA body scans revealed that this weight loss was almost entirely due to reduced body fat content.

On the other hand, the first fasting group (Group 1) experienced the same reduced calorie intake. After fasting on every alternate day and eating 50% more on non-fasting days, they lost 1.6 kg, half of which came from reduced body fat, and the remaining amount was from muscle mass.

In group 3, fasting without energy restriction (0:200%) did not significantly reduce body mass. 

The results showed that alternate-day fasting reduces body fat mass less effectively than those with an energy-restricted diet. 

Also, analysis of cardiometabolic health and gut hormones and the expression of key genes in subcutaneous adipose tissue showed no significant changes between the fasting and energy-restricted groups.

More Read

intermittent fasting

Intermittent fasting stimulates lipolysis and ketogenesis to support energy requirements while the cell functions and maintains integrity. It also efficiently recycles the limited nutrients available with increased autophagy (de Cabo et al., 2019).

“Many people believe that diets based on fasting are an effective way to lose weight or that these diets have particular metabolic health benefits even though they don’t stimulate weight loss.”

“But intermittent fasting is no magic bullet, and the findings of our experiment suggest that there is nothing special about fasting when compared with more traditional, standard diets people might follow”, says Professor James Betts, Director of the Centre for Nutrition, Exercise & Metabolism at the University of Bath.

Intermittent fasting less effectively reduces body fat than a daily calorie-restricted diet and does not show any evidence of fasting-specific outcomes on metabolism or cardiovascular health—the study concluded.

Related Publication and Further Readings

de Cabo, R. and M. P. Mattson (2019). “Effects of Intermittent Fasting on Health, Aging, and Disease.” N Engl J Med 381(26): 2541-2551.

Templeman, I., H. A. Smith, et al. (2021). “A randomized controlled trial to isolate the effects of fasting and energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic health in lean adults.” Science Translational Medicine 13(598).


Recent Post

Earliest Animals

What Did the Earliest Animals Look Like?

Biologists have been searching for the earliest animals for more than a century, narrowing the possibilities down to two groups: sponges and comb jellies. Researchers...



For Weight Loss, Vegan Is Better Than the Mediterranean Diet

Vegan is more effective for weight loss, cholesterol control, body composition, and insulin sensitivity, when compared head to head with Mediterranean diet.


Air Pollution Increases the Risk of Chronic Diseases in Adults

A study involving almost 364,000 English citizens shows traffic-related air pollution raises the risk of several long-term physical and mental health disorders.

Early Life Experiences Can Have Long-Lasting Impact on Genes

A new study on fruit flies led by UCL scientists demonstrates that early life events can have a lasting effect on the activity of...

What Did the Earliest Animals Look Like?

Biologists have been searching for the earliest animals for more than a century, narrowing the possibilities down to two groups: sponges and comb jellies. Researchers...

Time-Restricted Eating Reshapes Gene Expression Throughout the Body

Timed caloric intake synchronizes circadian rhythms across several systems in mice by influencing numerous gene expressions, found researchers at Salk Institute Key Points: Time- restricted eating...

Study: Evolution is now acknowledged by the majority of Americans

Highlights: - According to a recent University of Michigan study, 54% of Americans now accept the theory of evolution as the most plausible explanation for...